<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 224 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34403</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeal)&#039;s decision to allow cash refund of Rs. 41,709/- to the Respondent, considering the impracticality of re-crediting the amount to the Cenvat credit account due to the closure of the factory and surrender of registration. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the specific circumstances of the case over strict interpretation of the rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 224 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34403</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeal)&#039;s decision to allow cash refund of Rs. 41,709/- to the Respondent, considering the impracticality of re-crediting the amount to the Cenvat credit account due to the closure of the factory and surrender of registration. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the specific circumstances of the case over strict interpretation of the rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>