https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310441 The Calcutta HC noted two issues: whether the impugned order was appealable before the Tribunal, and whether the maintainability of the refund application had to be adjudicated before the writ petition could be sent to the Tribunal. No substantive determination is recorded in the text. Procedurally, the court directed filing of an affidavit-in-opposition within four weeks, a reply within two weeks thereafter, and listing of the matter after eight weeks under the same heading. en-us Fri, 05 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Oct 2023 07:43:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310441 The Calcutta HC noted two issues: whether the impugned order was appealable before the Tribunal, and whether the maintainability of the refund application had to be adjudicated before the writ petition could be sent to the Tribunal. No substantive determination is recorded in the text. Procedurally, the court directed filing of an affidavit-in-opposition within four weeks, a reply within two weeks thereafter, and listing of the matter after eight weeks under the same heading. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 05 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310441