<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1895 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310443</link>
    <description>ITAT Pune dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding working capital adjustment in transfer pricing matter. TPO had proposed adjustment which AO adopted under sections 143(3) read with 144C(4). Assessee argued it provided services to associates at lower prices and required working capital adjustment when customers paid later while assessee operated on cash basis. CIT(A) allowed working capital adjustment relying on precedents including Vedaris Technologies and OECD Guidelines. ITAT upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision directing AO to grant working capital adjustment based on average credit/debit period and commercial interest rates, finding no merit in Revenue&#039;s grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2023 07:43:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=730235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1895 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310443</link>
      <description>ITAT Pune dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding working capital adjustment in transfer pricing matter. TPO had proposed adjustment which AO adopted under sections 143(3) read with 144C(4). Assessee argued it provided services to associates at lower prices and required working capital adjustment when customers paid later while assessee operated on cash basis. CIT(A) allowed working capital adjustment relying on precedents including Vedaris Technologies and OECD Guidelines. ITAT upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision directing AO to grant working capital adjustment based on average credit/debit period and commercial interest rates, finding no merit in Revenue&#039;s grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>