https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34400 The Tribunal accepted the appellants' argument of a violation of natural justice principles due to lack of opportunity to respond before the impugned order was passed. The impugned order was set aside, and the case remanded for a fresh decision by the Commissioner, with instructions to consider the appellants' reply and provide a hearing. The appeal was allowed, leading to the lifting of the detention notice on goods and granting of miscellaneous applications and stay requests. The decision was made by the Vice-President and Member of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai. en-us Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34400 The Tribunal accepted the appellants' argument of a violation of natural justice principles due to lack of opportunity to respond before the impugned order was passed. The impugned order was set aside, and the case remanded for a fresh decision by the Commissioner, with instructions to consider the appellants' reply and provide a hearing. The appeal was allowed, leading to the lifting of the detention notice on goods and granting of miscellaneous applications and stay requests. The decision was made by the Vice-President and Member of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34400