https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444930 Anticipatory bail was declined where investigation indicated fraudulent registration of a firm using the complainant's PAN, large transactions routed through entities linked to the applicants, and involvement of their associates in opening bank accounts and creating firms. The Court treated the applicants' replies as evasive and contradictory, and held that the argument that mere non-cooperation cannot by itself justify arrest did not help on these facts. Custodial interrogation was found necessary to trace the full chain of transactions and the entities allegedly controlled by the applicants. en-us Fri, 20 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Apr 2025 10:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444930 Anticipatory bail was declined where investigation indicated fraudulent registration of a firm using the complainant's PAN, large transactions routed through entities linked to the applicants, and involvement of their associates in opening bank accounts and creating firms. The Court treated the applicants' replies as evasive and contradictory, and held that the argument that mere non-cooperation cannot by itself justify arrest did not help on these facts. Custodial interrogation was found necessary to trace the full chain of transactions and the entities allegedly controlled by the applicants. Case-Laws GST Fri, 20 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444930