<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 1122 - NATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING AUTHORITY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444899</link>
    <description>Auditors were found guilty of professional misconduct for failing to report material misstatements, issuing an unmodified opinion despite material departures from the financial reporting framework, and relying on inadequate audit evidence for write-back of liabilities, inventory valuation, IPO proceeds utilisation, and related party transactions. The findings also confirmed deficient documentation, overreliance on management assertions, and lack of professional skepticism. The audit firm was separately held responsible for failing to maintain effective quality control, independence safeguards, and engagement-level supervision. In view of the seriousness and multiplicity of the breaches, monetary penalties were imposed on both the firm and the engagement partner, and the engagement partner was debarred for three years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2023 16:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=730196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 1122 - NATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING AUTHORITY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444899</link>
      <description>Auditors were found guilty of professional misconduct for failing to report material misstatements, issuing an unmodified opinion despite material departures from the financial reporting framework, and relying on inadequate audit evidence for write-back of liabilities, inventory valuation, IPO proceeds utilisation, and related party transactions. The findings also confirmed deficient documentation, overreliance on management assertions, and lack of professional skepticism. The audit firm was separately held responsible for failing to maintain effective quality control, independence safeguards, and engagement-level supervision. In view of the seriousness and multiplicity of the breaches, monetary penalties were imposed on both the firm and the engagement partner, and the engagement partner was debarred for three years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>