<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (3) TMI 60 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310427</link>
    <description>A suit under Section 92 CPC must fit the statutory scheme for public religious or charitable trusts, with reliefs confined to breach of trust or directions for administration. Where concurrent findings showed no proved breach and no need for administrative directions, the foundation for Section 92 relief failed. In that situation, a bare declaration that the suit properties were trust properties could not be added as an independent or lesser relief, because any unnecessary finding on trust character was only incidental and not part of the operative decree. The declaratory portion was therefore struck out, while the dismissal of the suit otherwise remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2023 10:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=730158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (3) TMI 60 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310427</link>
      <description>A suit under Section 92 CPC must fit the statutory scheme for public religious or charitable trusts, with reliefs confined to breach of trust or directions for administration. Where concurrent findings showed no proved breach and no need for administrative directions, the foundation for Section 92 relief failed. In that situation, a bare declaration that the suit properties were trust properties could not be added as an independent or lesser relief, because any unnecessary finding on trust character was only incidental and not part of the operative decree. The declaratory portion was therefore struck out, while the dismissal of the suit otherwise remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>