<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (4) TMI 369 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310428</link>
    <description>Civil court findings on the existence of a public trust, title of property as trust property, and identification of trustees cannot displace the statutory scheme under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950, because those matters fall within the Charity authorities&#039; jurisdiction. A decision given without jurisdiction cannot form a valid basis for res judicata. The document further notes that a finding which is merely incidental to the main issue, or recorded in a suit dismissed on technical grounds without adjudication on merits, is not a matter directly and substantially in issue finally decided. On that basis, the earlier suit could not bar the later suit by res judicata.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2023 17:19:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=730157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (4) TMI 369 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310428</link>
      <description>Civil court findings on the existence of a public trust, title of property as trust property, and identification of trustees cannot displace the statutory scheme under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950, because those matters fall within the Charity authorities&#039; jurisdiction. A decision given without jurisdiction cannot form a valid basis for res judicata. The document further notes that a finding which is merely incidental to the main issue, or recorded in a suit dismissed on technical grounds without adjudication on merits, is not a matter directly and substantially in issue finally decided. On that basis, the earlier suit could not bar the later suit by res judicata.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>