https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310426 Custody after committal to the Court of Session was not rendered unlawful merely because the remand warrant omitted a definite period. The commitment order under Section 209 of the Code of Criminal Procedure authorised custody during and until conclusion of the sessions trial, subject to the Code on bail, and successive trial court orders fixing appearance dates regulated the detention. Sections 167 and 309 of the Code did not support the claim that an unstated period in the warrant made detention illegal, so the bail application was rejected. en-us Fri, 10 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Oct 2023 15:40:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310426 Custody after committal to the Court of Session was not rendered unlawful merely because the remand warrant omitted a definite period. The commitment order under Section 209 of the Code of Criminal Procedure authorised custody during and until conclusion of the sessions trial, subject to the Code on bail, and successive trial court orders fixing appearance dates regulated the detention. Sections 167 and 309 of the Code did not support the claim that an unstated period in the warrant made detention illegal, so the bail application was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310426