<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 1095 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444872</link>
    <description>The limitation period for an appeal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code runs from the date of the order, and an appellant must act with due diligence in seeking the certified copy. Where the order was uploaded on 19.04.2023, the certified copy was sought only on 04.05.2023 and the appeal was filed on 06.06.2023, the filing fell beyond the outer limit of thirty days plus the further fifteen days permitted by law. The Appellate Tribunal has no jurisdiction to condone delay beyond that additional period, and limitation is not suspended by waiting for a free copy. The appeal was therefore barred by limitation and condonation was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2023 10:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=730133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 1095 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444872</link>
      <description>The limitation period for an appeal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code runs from the date of the order, and an appellant must act with due diligence in seeking the certified copy. Where the order was uploaded on 19.04.2023, the certified copy was sought only on 04.05.2023 and the appeal was filed on 06.06.2023, the filing fell beyond the outer limit of thirty days plus the further fifteen days permitted by law. The Appellate Tribunal has no jurisdiction to condone delay beyond that additional period, and limitation is not suspended by waiting for a free copy. The appeal was therefore barred by limitation and condonation was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>