https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444847 The HC set aside the cancellation of GST registration and the notice issued to the petitioner, finding the notice vague and non-compliant with natural justice principles. The notice lacked the name and designation of the signatory and scheduled a hearing on a date later declared a holiday, without issuing any subsequent notice. The court held that cancellation under Section 29(2) proviso requires a proper opportunity of hearing, which was not provided. Consequently, the impugned order dated 23.08.2022 and the notice dated 06.08.2022 were quashed, and the petition was allowed. en-us Fri, 04 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Aug 2025 14:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444847 The HC set aside the cancellation of GST registration and the notice issued to the petitioner, finding the notice vague and non-compliant with natural justice principles. The notice lacked the name and designation of the signatory and scheduled a hearing on a date later declared a holiday, without issuing any subsequent notice. The court held that cancellation under Section 29(2) proviso requires a proper opportunity of hearing, which was not provided. Consequently, the impugned order dated 23.08.2022 and the notice dated 06.08.2022 were quashed, and the petition was allowed. Case-Laws GST Fri, 04 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444847