<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 2092 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310421</link>
    <description>Non-compliance with the CBDT circular&#039;s pre-deposit condition justified refusal to direct expeditious hearing of the stay application in the pending income-tax appeal. The petitioner had not deposited 20% of the demand and did not seek further time to make the deposit, so the condition for consideration of the stay application on merits was not satisfied. On that basis, the request for early hearing was declined and the petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2023 10:31:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=730063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 2092 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310421</link>
      <description>Non-compliance with the CBDT circular&#039;s pre-deposit condition justified refusal to direct expeditious hearing of the stay application in the pending income-tax appeal. The petitioner had not deposited 20% of the demand and did not seek further time to make the deposit, so the condition for consideration of the stay application on merits was not satisfied. On that basis, the request for early hearing was declined and the petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>