<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 1065 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310411</link>
    <description>Part IX-A of the Constitution does not apply ipso facto to Scheduled Areas unless Parliament extends it, so municipal administration there remains governed by the Fifth Schedule. A Governor may, by public notification, exclude or modify the application of a State law in a Scheduled Area, and the Orissa Municipal Act, 1950 was extended to Sundargarh through such notification with retrospective effect after its earlier exclusion was repealed. Because no specific inconsistency with Part IX-A was shown and the notification was not challenged, the municipal regime in Sundargarh was treated as valid and the continuance of the municipalities was not illegal on the grounds raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2023 11:42:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=730038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 1065 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310411</link>
      <description>Part IX-A of the Constitution does not apply ipso facto to Scheduled Areas unless Parliament extends it, so municipal administration there remains governed by the Fifth Schedule. A Governor may, by public notification, exclude or modify the application of a State law in a Scheduled Area, and the Orissa Municipal Act, 1950 was extended to Sundargarh through such notification with retrospective effect after its earlier exclusion was repealed. Because no specific inconsistency with Part IX-A was shown and the notification was not challenged, the municipal regime in Sundargarh was treated as valid and the continuance of the municipalities was not illegal on the grounds raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>