<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 1042 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444819</link>
    <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging the denial of input tax credit. The court set aside the original order and directed the Assessing Officer to reevaluate the petitioner&#039;s claim, allowing the submission of supporting evidence within ten days. The decision emphasized that discrepancies in tax forms should not automatically result in credit disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 14:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=730032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 1042 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444819</link>
      <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging the denial of input tax credit. The court set aside the original order and directed the Assessing Officer to reevaluate the petitioner&#039;s claim, allowing the submission of supporting evidence within ten days. The decision emphasized that discrepancies in tax forms should not automatically result in credit disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>