<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 1039 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444816</link>
    <description>Services rendered by an Indian affiliate are taxable as fees for technical services under the India-Singapore DTAA only if they satisfy the make available clause by transferring technical knowledge, skill, experience or processes so the recipient can apply them independently. The Tribunal held that continued dependence on the service provider over many years showed the recipient had not been enabled to perform the functions on its own. Mere incidental benefit or an enduring advantage was insufficient because the decisive test was whether the technology or skill had been absorbed and could be used without further assistance. On that basis, the income was not taxable as fees for technical services, and the finding was in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2023 17:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=730029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 1039 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444816</link>
      <description>Services rendered by an Indian affiliate are taxable as fees for technical services under the India-Singapore DTAA only if they satisfy the make available clause by transferring technical knowledge, skill, experience or processes so the recipient can apply them independently. The Tribunal held that continued dependence on the service provider over many years showed the recipient had not been enabled to perform the functions on its own. Mere incidental benefit or an enduring advantage was insufficient because the decisive test was whether the technology or skill had been absorbed and could be used without further assistance. On that basis, the income was not taxable as fees for technical services, and the finding was in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>