<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 1039 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444816</link>
    <description>The court allowed the condonation of a 45-day delay in re-filing the appeal, as there was no objection from the respondent. The appeal challenged the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision on whether services provided by the respondent to its Indian affiliate constituted &#039;Fees for Technical Services&#039; under the Indo-Singapore DTAA for the Assessment Year 2019-20. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, determining that the services did not meet the &#039;make available&#039; criterion of the DTAA, as they did not enable the recipient to apply the technology independently. The appeal was dismissed, with no substantial question of law arising.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2023 17:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=730029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 1039 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444816</link>
      <description>The court allowed the condonation of a 45-day delay in re-filing the appeal, as there was no objection from the respondent. The appeal challenged the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision on whether services provided by the respondent to its Indian affiliate constituted &#039;Fees for Technical Services&#039; under the Indo-Singapore DTAA for the Assessment Year 2019-20. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, determining that the services did not meet the &#039;make available&#039; criterion of the DTAA, as they did not enable the recipient to apply the technology independently. The appeal was dismissed, with no substantial question of law arising.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>