<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 994 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444771</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Appeal, granting the Appellant the benefit of closure under Sec 73(3) of the Finance Act, and set aside the penalties imposed under Sec 77 &amp;amp; 78. It determined that the Appellant had duly recorded the transaction in the books of accounts, paid the tax without dispute, and had no incentive to evade tax since Cenvat credit was available. Consequently, the Impugned Order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2023 21:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 994 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444771</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Appeal, granting the Appellant the benefit of closure under Sec 73(3) of the Finance Act, and set aside the penalties imposed under Sec 77 &amp;amp; 78. It determined that the Appellant had duly recorded the transaction in the books of accounts, paid the tax without dispute, and had no incentive to evade tax since Cenvat credit was available. Consequently, the Impugned Order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>