<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 990 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444767</link>
    <description>Printing textbooks, magazines and periodicals under a contract where the printer used its own paper, worked on a piece-rate basis, and delivered finished goods to the publisher was treated as a works contract rather than a sale. Applying the statutory definitions in the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957, and the constitutional position after Article 366(29-A), the decisive test was the nature of the transaction: any transfer of property in goods was only incidental to execution of the printing job, not a transfer of chattel as chattel. The exemption for sales of printed books and periodicals was held inapplicable because the contract was for printing work itself.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 990 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444767</link>
      <description>Printing textbooks, magazines and periodicals under a contract where the printer used its own paper, worked on a piece-rate basis, and delivered finished goods to the publisher was treated as a works contract rather than a sale. Applying the statutory definitions in the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957, and the constitutional position after Article 366(29-A), the decisive test was the nature of the transaction: any transfer of property in goods was only incidental to execution of the printing job, not a transfer of chattel as chattel. The exemption for sales of printed books and periodicals was held inapplicable because the contract was for printing work itself.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>