<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 827 - THE COMPANY LAW BOARD ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310396</link>
    <description>Valid shareholding is a threshold requirement for seeking oppression and mismanagement relief under the Companies Act, 1956. Transfer of 23,200 shares was treated as invalid because the required conditions under the articles of association-including majority board approval, payment of fair value, written transfer notice and fair-value determination-were not established. The absence of original share certificates, payment evidence and consistent assertions of shareholding further undermined the claimant&#039;s status as a member. Without valid membership, the claimant lacked locus standi to invoke relief for oppression and mismanagement; the company petition and impleadment application were dismissed, and the interim order was vacated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2023 17:43:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 827 - THE COMPANY LAW BOARD ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310396</link>
      <description>Valid shareholding is a threshold requirement for seeking oppression and mismanagement relief under the Companies Act, 1956. Transfer of 23,200 shares was treated as invalid because the required conditions under the articles of association-including majority board approval, payment of fair value, written transfer notice and fair-value determination-were not established. The absence of original share certificates, payment evidence and consistent assertions of shareholding further undermined the claimant&#039;s status as a member. Without valid membership, the claimant lacked locus standi to invoke relief for oppression and mismanagement; the company petition and impleadment application were dismissed, and the interim order was vacated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>