<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>NCLAT Upholds Asset Freeze Order: IL&amp;FS Rent Assignment to HDFC Confirmed Under Transfer of Property Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72683</link>
    <description>Scope of an asset and security freeze order - assignment or not - The reference to pledge, in some places in the documents, did not undermine the fact that the rents payable to and receivable by the lender (IL&amp;FS) stood absolutely assigned to HDFC. The provisions of the TPA and the discussion of the various authorities support the conclusion that there can be a transfer of debts, which are defined as actionable claims. In the present case, the rents payable by IL&amp;FS tenants, lessees and licensees are debts, which stood transferred to the creditor, i.e. HDFC Bank. Therefore, the NCLAT’s conclusions are unexceptionable; the challenge to its correctness, therefore fails. - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2023 08:02:55 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2023 08:02:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729924" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>NCLAT Upholds Asset Freeze Order: IL&amp;FS Rent Assignment to HDFC Confirmed Under Transfer of Property Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72683</link>
      <description>Scope of an asset and security freeze order - assignment or not - The reference to pledge, in some places in the documents, did not undermine the fact that the rents payable to and receivable by the lender (IL&amp;FS) stood absolutely assigned to HDFC. The provisions of the TPA and the discussion of the various authorities support the conclusion that there can be a transfer of debts, which are defined as actionable claims. In the present case, the rents payable by IL&amp;FS tenants, lessees and licensees are debts, which stood transferred to the creditor, i.e. HDFC Bank. Therefore, the NCLAT’s conclusions are unexceptionable; the challenge to its correctness, therefore fails. - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2023 08:02:55 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>