<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 971 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444748</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 270A of the Income Tax Act and directed the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty. The Tribunal found that the addition to the total income was due to a change in the head of income, not underreporting. It concluded that the assessee&#039;s explanation was genuine and fell under an exception to underreporting, thus a bona fide mistake in computing income should not result in a penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2023 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 971 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444748</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 270A of the Income Tax Act and directed the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty. The Tribunal found that the addition to the total income was due to a change in the head of income, not underreporting. It concluded that the assessee&#039;s explanation was genuine and fell under an exception to underreporting, thus a bona fide mistake in computing income should not result in a penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>