<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 964 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444741</link>
    <description>An exhaustive tariff entry listing specific goods after the expression &quot;i.e.&quot; covers only those named items, so nutritional supplements under CTSH 2106 9099 were treated as falling outside Serial No. 9 of Schedule IV and within the residual rate under Serial No. 453 of Schedule III, attracting IGST at 18% rather than 28%. The commentary also notes that the differential IGST demand was time-barred because the classification issue was within the assessing authority&#039;s knowledge, no suppression of facts was shown, and the matter was revenue neutral due to input tax credit availability. On that basis, the extended period could not be invoked.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2023 07:01:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 964 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444741</link>
      <description>An exhaustive tariff entry listing specific goods after the expression &quot;i.e.&quot; covers only those named items, so nutritional supplements under CTSH 2106 9099 were treated as falling outside Serial No. 9 of Schedule IV and within the residual rate under Serial No. 453 of Schedule III, attracting IGST at 18% rather than 28%. The commentary also notes that the differential IGST demand was time-barred because the classification issue was within the assessing authority&#039;s knowledge, no suppression of facts was shown, and the matter was revenue neutral due to input tax credit availability. On that basis, the extended period could not be invoked.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>