<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 962 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444739</link>
    <description>Contemporaneous financing documents, read as a whole, showed an unconditional transfer of receivables to the lender for repayment. The Court held that the substance of the arrangement, not the label of &quot;pledge,&quot; governed its character, so the transaction was an assignment of receivables rather than a mere security interest. Future rent receivables were treated as actionable claims transferable by written instrument under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Once assigned, they ceased to remain the borrower&#039;s property to that extent and were outside the asset freeze order, leaving the borrower only the residual balance beyond the facility liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2023 07:01:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 962 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444739</link>
      <description>Contemporaneous financing documents, read as a whole, showed an unconditional transfer of receivables to the lender for repayment. The Court held that the substance of the arrangement, not the label of &quot;pledge,&quot; governed its character, so the transaction was an assignment of receivables rather than a mere security interest. Future rent receivables were treated as actionable claims transferable by written instrument under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Once assigned, they ceased to remain the borrower&#039;s property to that extent and were outside the asset freeze order, leaving the borrower only the residual balance beyond the facility liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>