<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 955 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444732</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal. It held that the lack of ISD registration was a procedural irregularity that did not disqualify the appellant from availing CENVAT credit. Additionally, the distribution of 100% credit to a single unit was permissible under the rules existing during the relevant period. The issue of the demand being time-barred was left open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2023 11:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 955 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444732</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal. It held that the lack of ISD registration was a procedural irregularity that did not disqualify the appellant from availing CENVAT credit. Additionally, the distribution of 100% credit to a single unit was permissible under the rules existing during the relevant period. The issue of the demand being time-barred was left open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444732</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>