https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34364 The court dismissed the writ petitions, ruling that the petitioner should have pursued the available remedy of filing an appeal under the Customs Act, 1962, rather than seeking relief through a writ petition. The court emphasized that disputed factual matters, such as patent infringement claims, should be addressed through the statutory appeal process. The court did not delve into the issue of territorial jurisdiction, given its decision on the maintainability of the writ petitions. en-us Tue, 04 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Mar 2013 12:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34364 The court dismissed the writ petitions, ruling that the petitioner should have pursued the available remedy of filing an appeal under the Customs Act, 1962, rather than seeking relief through a writ petition. The court emphasized that disputed factual matters, such as patent infringement claims, should be addressed through the statutory appeal process. The court did not delve into the issue of territorial jurisdiction, given its decision on the maintainability of the writ petitions. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 04 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34364