<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 71 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34361</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the CIT(A) order, confirming the deletion of Rs.37,71,931 as stock value difference and Rs.11,00,000 advance payment discrepancies. The Tribunal found no irregularities in the decision, supported by factual analysis and legal principles. The appeal was dismissed without costs, as no substantial question of law arose for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 71 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34361</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the CIT(A) order, confirming the deletion of Rs.37,71,931 as stock value difference and Rs.11,00,000 advance payment discrepancies. The Tribunal found no irregularities in the decision, supported by factual analysis and legal principles. The appeal was dismissed without costs, as no substantial question of law arose for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>