<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (1) TMI 86 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310375</link>
    <description>A warrant issued by an Indian magistrate on prima facie evidence of offences triable in India remained valid even though the accused was outside India; execution abroad depended on executive assistance and the foreign authority&#039;s own law, and the Hong Kong endorsement could not be challenged in these proceedings. The Government&#039;s recourse to diplomatic channels to secure surrender was not prohibited by law, because extradition and surrender depended on municipal law, international comity, and the willingness of the foreign authority to act under its own legal framework. The appeal succeeded, the High Court&#039;s order was set aside, and the challenge to the arrest and surrender process failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2023 14:36:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (1) TMI 86 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310375</link>
      <description>A warrant issued by an Indian magistrate on prima facie evidence of offences triable in India remained valid even though the accused was outside India; execution abroad depended on executive assistance and the foreign authority&#039;s own law, and the Hong Kong endorsement could not be challenged in these proceedings. The Government&#039;s recourse to diplomatic channels to secure surrender was not prohibited by law, because extradition and surrender depended on municipal law, international comity, and the willingness of the foreign authority to act under its own legal framework. The appeal succeeded, the High Court&#039;s order was set aside, and the challenge to the arrest and surrender process failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>