https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310351 For enforcement of a foreign arbitral award, public policy of India is construed narrowly, so a foreign limitation rule will not defeat enforcement merely because Indian limitation law may differ. Limitation was treated as procedural and, where Singapore was the seat and Singapore law governed, the limitation law followed the law of the seat. The court also noted that the arbitrator's reliance on Singapore limitation was a plausible view on the facts. A jurisdictional objection to claims for teleport and occasional services was rejected because it was not raised in the defence statement and was pressed only at the stage of closing submissions; the services were also treated as part of the contractual arrangement. en-us Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Oct 2023 10:16:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310351 For enforcement of a foreign arbitral award, public policy of India is construed narrowly, so a foreign limitation rule will not defeat enforcement merely because Indian limitation law may differ. Limitation was treated as procedural and, where Singapore was the seat and Singapore law governed, the limitation law followed the law of the seat. The court also noted that the arbitrator's reliance on Singapore limitation was a plausible view on the facts. A jurisdictional objection to claims for teleport and occasional services was rejected because it was not raised in the defence statement and was pressed only at the stage of closing submissions; the services were also treated as part of the contractual arrangement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310351