<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 1198 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310360</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed applications for impleadment/intervention and post-order prayers, advising fresh applications if grievances persisted. Applications for modification of the 15.10.2018 order and preferential payments were closed due to contradictions with the approved Resolution Framework. Applications related to resolved entities and settled parties were closed without further orders. Previously disposed applications and those by ILFS entities deemed infructuous were dismissed. NHAI&#039;s bank guarantee invocation was rejected, with an extension granted. An application for outstanding payments was approved, and the State Bank of India was directed to manage bank guarantees accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2023 10:16:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 1198 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310360</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed applications for impleadment/intervention and post-order prayers, advising fresh applications if grievances persisted. Applications for modification of the 15.10.2018 order and preferential payments were closed due to contradictions with the approved Resolution Framework. Applications related to resolved entities and settled parties were closed without further orders. Previously disposed applications and those by ILFS entities deemed infructuous were dismissed. NHAI&#039;s bank guarantee invocation was rejected, with an extension granted. An application for outstanding payments was approved, and the State Bank of India was directed to manage bank guarantees accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>