<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 19 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34355</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit could be used to discharge service tax on goods transport agency service for the period before deletion of the Explanation to Rule 2(p) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal followed earlier decisions treating goods transport agency service as an output service under the pre-amendment regime, so utilisation of CENVAT credit for payment of service tax on that service was permissible in the period in dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 19 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34355</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit could be used to discharge service tax on goods transport agency service for the period before deletion of the Explanation to Rule 2(p) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal followed earlier decisions treating goods transport agency service as an output service under the pre-amendment regime, so utilisation of CENVAT credit for payment of service tax on that service was permissible in the period in dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>