<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 1262 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310367</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the assessee, ruling that there was no under-reporting of income warranting a penalty under section 270A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The penalty related to the annual value of house property was deleted, as the error was attributed to the Accountant&#039;s mistake. Additionally, the penalty for misreporting interest income under the wrong head was also removed, as the error was deemed a bonafide belief with no tax difference between the income heads.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 14:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 1262 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310367</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the assessee, ruling that there was no under-reporting of income warranting a penalty under section 270A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The penalty related to the annual value of house property was deleted, as the error was attributed to the Accountant&#039;s mistake. Additionally, the penalty for misreporting interest income under the wrong head was also removed, as the error was deemed a bonafide belief with no tax difference between the income heads.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>