https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444720 HC allowed the writ petition challenging a tax demand order. The court found that the Deputy Commissioner violated procedural fairness by denying the petitioner an opportunity for oral hearing as mandated under Section 75(4) of U.P. GST Act. The original order was set aside, and the matter was remitted back with directions to issue a fresh notice and provide a proper hearing within two weeks. en-us Mon, 16 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Apr 2025 13:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444720 HC allowed the writ petition challenging a tax demand order. The court found that the Deputy Commissioner violated procedural fairness by denying the petitioner an opportunity for oral hearing as mandated under Section 75(4) of U.P. GST Act. The original order was set aside, and the matter was remitted back with directions to issue a fresh notice and provide a proper hearing within two weeks. Case-Laws GST Mon, 16 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444720