<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 942 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444719</link>
    <description>A GST detention order was set aside where the vehicle was intercepted and the goods carried did not match the descriptions in the e-way bills and e-invoices. The court found the impugned order unsustainable on the existing record and directed fresh consideration under the applicable detention provisions. The matter was remitted for reconsideration in accordance with law after granting the petitioner due opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 13:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 942 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444719</link>
      <description>A GST detention order was set aside where the vehicle was intercepted and the goods carried did not match the descriptions in the e-way bills and e-invoices. The court found the impugned order unsustainable on the existing record and directed fresh consideration under the applicable detention provisions. The matter was remitted for reconsideration in accordance with law after granting the petitioner due opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>