<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 937 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444714</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the petition, overturning the Appellate Authority&#039;s decision. It directed the respondents to process the petitioner&#039;s refund claim, including applicable interest, within two weeks. The court found the rejection unsustainable as the petitioner had submitted sufficient documentary evidence, and the relevant date for limitation was clear from the shipping bills and invoices. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 937 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444714</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the petition, overturning the Appellate Authority&#039;s decision. It directed the respondents to process the petitioner&#039;s refund claim, including applicable interest, within two weeks. The court found the rejection unsustainable as the petitioner had submitted sufficient documentary evidence, and the relevant date for limitation was clear from the shipping bills and invoices. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444714</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>