<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 930 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444707</link>
    <description>HC granted petitioner liberty to file statutory appeal within 30 days challenging tax assessment order. Despite procedural delays and potential jurisdictional issues, court allowed appeal opportunity, directing appellate authority to decide within 6 months and suspending recovery proceedings. Principles of natural justice were considered in resolving the tax dispute, balancing procedural requirements with substantive justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 15:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 930 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444707</link>
      <description>HC granted petitioner liberty to file statutory appeal within 30 days challenging tax assessment order. Despite procedural delays and potential jurisdictional issues, court allowed appeal opportunity, directing appellate authority to decide within 6 months and suspending recovery proceedings. Principles of natural justice were considered in resolving the tax dispute, balancing procedural requirements with substantive justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>