<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 926 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444703</link>
    <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging tax assessment and recovery notices. The court held that denying input tax credit solely based on GSTR 2A and GSTR 3B discrepancies is unsustainable. The Assessing Officer must reexamine the petitioner&#039;s evidence and provide an opportunity to substantiate the input tax credit claim, with fresh orders to be passed after comprehensive evaluation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 16:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729746" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 926 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444703</link>
      <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging tax assessment and recovery notices. The court held that denying input tax credit solely based on GSTR 2A and GSTR 3B discrepancies is unsustainable. The Assessing Officer must reexamine the petitioner&#039;s evidence and provide an opportunity to substantiate the input tax credit claim, with fresh orders to be passed after comprehensive evaluation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>