<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 898 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444675</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, overturning the decision to revoke the Custom Broker License and forfeit the Security Deposit under the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations. The Tribunal found that the Customs Broker&#039;s role was limited to facilitating clearance based on client instructions and did not include determining exemption eligibility or monitoring post-import conditions. Consequently, the penalties imposed by the Commissioner of Customs, Kolkata, were deemed unwarranted, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2023 10:10:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 898 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444675</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, overturning the decision to revoke the Custom Broker License and forfeit the Security Deposit under the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations. The Tribunal found that the Customs Broker&#039;s role was limited to facilitating clearance based on client instructions and did not include determining exemption eligibility or monitoring post-import conditions. Consequently, the penalties imposed by the Commissioner of Customs, Kolkata, were deemed unwarranted, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>