<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 891 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444668</link>
    <description>The court permitted the petitioner to utilize 25% of the total foreign contribution funds, including those in fixed deposits and government bonds, for daily operations. The petitioner was required to periodically submit a comprehensive statement of its FCRA account, deposits, and expenses. The judgment clarified that the phrase &quot;his custody&quot; in Section 13(2) of FCRA extends beyond the current account, enabling the use of unspent funds from multiple sources.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2023 10:09:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 891 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444668</link>
      <description>The court permitted the petitioner to utilize 25% of the total foreign contribution funds, including those in fixed deposits and government bonds, for daily operations. The petitioner was required to periodically submit a comprehensive statement of its FCRA account, deposits, and expenses. The judgment clarified that the phrase &quot;his custody&quot; in Section 13(2) of FCRA extends beyond the current account, enabling the use of unspent funds from multiple sources.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>