https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310348 A plaint signed and verified by an authorised agent, rather than by the plaintiffs themselves, was held to be a curable procedural irregularity under Order VI Rules 14 and 15 CPC where the plaintiffs had authorised the filing. Once the plaintiffs later signed and verified the plaint, the defect stood cured and the amendment related back to the original date of institution. The court held that the suit was not rendered a nullity and the limitation objection could not succeed merely because the plaint was not properly signed at the outset. en-us Thu, 15 Feb 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Oct 2023 17:34:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310348 A plaint signed and verified by an authorised agent, rather than by the plaintiffs themselves, was held to be a curable procedural irregularity under Order VI Rules 14 and 15 CPC where the plaintiffs had authorised the filing. Once the plaintiffs later signed and verified the plaint, the defect stood cured and the amendment related back to the original date of institution. The court held that the suit was not rendered a nullity and the limitation objection could not succeed merely because the plaint was not properly signed at the outset. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 15 Feb 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310348