<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (9) TMI 213 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310344</link>
    <description>The Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 was construed to treat section 133 as governing only the imposition of municipal tax, not the entire assessment and recovery machinery. The phrase &quot;system of assessment&quot; was read narrowly, so the resolution imposing the tax was not invalid for lacking detailed procedures later contemplated by bye-laws under section 427(3). The Court also held that advertisement tax was not inoperative before separate bye-laws were framed, because sections 173 to 175 already provided a quasi-judicial recovery mechanism through bill presentation, objections, notice of demand, and appeal. The petitions failed and the tax was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2023 15:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (9) TMI 213 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310344</link>
      <description>The Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 was construed to treat section 133 as governing only the imposition of municipal tax, not the entire assessment and recovery machinery. The phrase &quot;system of assessment&quot; was read narrowly, so the resolution imposing the tax was not invalid for lacking detailed procedures later contemplated by bye-laws under section 427(3). The Court also held that advertisement tax was not inoperative before separate bye-laws were framed, because sections 173 to 175 already provided a quasi-judicial recovery mechanism through bill presentation, objections, notice of demand, and appeal. The petitions failed and the tax was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>