https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310343 Pre-execution judicial review of a detention order is confined to recognised exceptions, including orders made for a wrong purpose or founded on vague, extraneous, or irrelevant grounds. A challenge alleging non-application of mind, suppression of vital material, or collateral purpose falls within that limited review. Where material documents and statements were not placed before the detaining authority, the subjective satisfaction required for preventive detention is vitiated. An order ostensibly aimed at preventing future smuggling may also be invalid where the contemporaneous record indicates an extraneous purpose. en-us Fri, 06 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Oct 2023 12:53:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310343 Pre-execution judicial review of a detention order is confined to recognised exceptions, including orders made for a wrong purpose or founded on vague, extraneous, or irrelevant grounds. A challenge alleging non-application of mind, suppression of vital material, or collateral purpose falls within that limited review. Where material documents and statements were not placed before the detaining authority, the subjective satisfaction required for preventive detention is vitiated. An order ostensibly aimed at preventing future smuggling may also be invalid where the contemporaneous record indicates an extraneous purpose. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 06 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310343