https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310342 A stale claim for arrears of salary based on earlier pay protection was barred by limitation, laches, waiver and acquiescence because the rejection had long attained finality and the employee had not challenged it within the statutory time. The court held that the earlier rejection could not be revived through a continuing cause of action, so arrears of salary were not payable. However, the right to pension was treated as a continuing right, and limitation did not extinguish entitlement to pensionary fixation. On that basis, revised pensionary benefits were permitted on a notional pay-protection basis from 19.10.2001. en-us Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Oct 2023 11:35:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310342 A stale claim for arrears of salary based on earlier pay protection was barred by limitation, laches, waiver and acquiescence because the rejection had long attained finality and the employee had not challenged it within the statutory time. The court held that the earlier rejection could not be revived through a continuing cause of action, so arrears of salary were not payable. However, the right to pension was treated as a continuing right, and limitation did not extinguish entitlement to pensionary fixation. On that basis, revised pensionary benefits were permitted on a notional pay-protection basis from 19.10.2001. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310342