<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessment Order Valid When AO Chooses One of Two Legal Views; CIT Cannot Invoke Section 263 Jurisdiction.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72638</link>
    <description>Revision u/s 263 - The principal of the law emanating that when two views are legally possible and AO adopts one view the Assessment Order cannot be said to be erroneous for the CIT to invoke jurisdiction u/s 263. In this case the AO has taken one of the possible Legal View. Hence, the Assessment Order is not erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2023 10:01:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2023 10:01:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessment Order Valid When AO Chooses One of Two Legal Views; CIT Cannot Invoke Section 263 Jurisdiction.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72638</link>
      <description>Revision u/s 263 - The principal of the law emanating that when two views are legally possible and AO adopts one view the Assessment Order cannot be said to be erroneous for the CIT to invoke jurisdiction u/s 263. In this case the AO has taken one of the possible Legal View. Hence, the Assessment Order is not erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2023 10:01:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=72638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>