<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 47 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34340</link>
    <description>The court allowed the condonation of delay in filing appeals challenging the correctness of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order. It emphasized the importance of considering the applicability of section 161(1A) and Explanation 2 of section 164, directing the assessing authority to assess the appellant&#039;s income sources for the relevant assessment years in accordance with the final order. The court highlighted the necessity for the Tribunal to hear the appellant before passing any orders and clarified that the dismissal of the special leave petition by the Supreme Court did not absolve the Tribunal from examining the legal evidence on record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 47 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34340</link>
      <description>The court allowed the condonation of delay in filing appeals challenging the correctness of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order. It emphasized the importance of considering the applicability of section 161(1A) and Explanation 2 of section 164, directing the assessing authority to assess the appellant&#039;s income sources for the relevant assessment years in accordance with the final order. The court highlighted the necessity for the Tribunal to hear the appellant before passing any orders and clarified that the dismissal of the special leave petition by the Supreme Court did not absolve the Tribunal from examining the legal evidence on record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>