<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 857 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444634</link>
    <description>The court resolved the petition by determining that the provisional attachment of the petitioner&#039;s bank accounts under Section 83 of the CGST Act was no longer valid, as the latest order dated 08.08.2022 had expired. The court directed the concerned bank not to restrict the operation of the petitioner&#039;s bank accounts based on the expired order or any prior orders issued by the GST Authorities. Consequently, the petitioner&#039;s grievance was deemed resolved, and the petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2023 09:37:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 857 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444634</link>
      <description>The court resolved the petition by determining that the provisional attachment of the petitioner&#039;s bank accounts under Section 83 of the CGST Act was no longer valid, as the latest order dated 08.08.2022 had expired. The court directed the concerned bank not to restrict the operation of the petitioner&#039;s bank accounts based on the expired order or any prior orders issued by the GST Authorities. Consequently, the petitioner&#039;s grievance was deemed resolved, and the petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>