<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 217 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34336</link>
    <description>The court acknowledged the need for a larger Bench to review the interpretation of the proviso appended to section 113 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, emphasizing the importance of strictly interpreting taxing statutes and avoiding retrospective effects. The court decided to condone the delay, directing the case to be presented before the Chief Justice for the constitution of a larger Bench to ensure a comprehensive analysis of the legal principles involved in the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 217 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34336</link>
      <description>The court acknowledged the need for a larger Bench to review the interpretation of the proviso appended to section 113 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, emphasizing the importance of strictly interpreting taxing statutes and avoiding retrospective effects. The court decided to condone the delay, directing the case to be presented before the Chief Justice for the constitution of a larger Bench to ensure a comprehensive analysis of the legal principles involved in the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>