<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 803 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444580</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, ruling that CENVAT credit is permissible for exported prototype vehicles, even without realization of export proceeds, as testing is integral to the manufacturing process. It determined that prototype vehicles qualify as excisable goods under the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal also held that the extended period for credit recovery is inapplicable due to the absence of suppression or intent to evade duty, as the appellants had consistently filed returns and exported under bond.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2023 16:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=729569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 803 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444580</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, ruling that CENVAT credit is permissible for exported prototype vehicles, even without realization of export proceeds, as testing is integral to the manufacturing process. It determined that prototype vehicles qualify as excisable goods under the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal also held that the extended period for credit recovery is inapplicable due to the absence of suppression or intent to evade duty, as the appellants had consistently filed returns and exported under bond.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=444580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>