https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34333 The High Court upheld the ITAT's decision to remand the matter back to the Assessing Officer for re-determination, dismissing the appellant's contentions. The Court found no judicial bias despite enhanced undisclosed income in the second Block assessment order. It concluded that the ITAT's fresh observations were consistent with the original order and refused to award costs to the assessee. The Court determined that the Tribunal's decision to remand for re-determination was valid and not perverse, ultimately dismissing the appeal. en-us Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Sep 2011 17:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34333 The High Court upheld the ITAT's decision to remand the matter back to the Assessing Officer for re-determination, dismissing the appellant's contentions. The Court found no judicial bias despite enhanced undisclosed income in the second Block assessment order. It concluded that the ITAT's fresh observations were consistent with the original order and refused to award costs to the assessee. The Court determined that the Tribunal's decision to remand for re-determination was valid and not perverse, ultimately dismissing the appeal. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34333