https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310321 Cheating requires deception and dishonest or fraudulent inducement, and where the misleading material was sent from India but received and acted on in Malaya, part of the offence was committed outside India. In that situation, the territorial reach of Indian criminal process was governed by the provision equivalent to Section 188 CrPC, so a certificate or sanction under its first proviso was required before an Indian court could assume jurisdiction. In the absence of that statutory approval, the prosecution could not proceed and the proceedings were quashed. en-us Mon, 24 Jul 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Oct 2023 18:41:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310321 Cheating requires deception and dishonest or fraudulent inducement, and where the misleading material was sent from India but received and acted on in Malaya, part of the offence was committed outside India. In that situation, the territorial reach of Indian criminal process was governed by the provision equivalent to Section 188 CrPC, so a certificate or sanction under its first proviso was required before an Indian court could assume jurisdiction. In the absence of that statutory approval, the prosecution could not proceed and the proceedings were quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 24 Jul 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310321