https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310316 The appeal was dismissed with costs by the court. The case centered on whether the plaintiff's suit was barred by limitation against the 5th defendant due to a devolution of interest during the suit's pendency. The court ruled that the transfer of interest to the 5th defendant occurred before the 4th defendant was added to the suit, and the application to add the 5th defendant was made after the limitation period had expired. The judgment emphasized that the limitation period is affected only when a new party is formally added to the suit, not merely by filing an application. en-us Fri, 10 Oct 1924 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Oct 2023 15:46:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310316 The appeal was dismissed with costs by the court. The case centered on whether the plaintiff's suit was barred by limitation against the 5th defendant due to a devolution of interest during the suit's pendency. The court ruled that the transfer of interest to the 5th defendant occurred before the 4th defendant was added to the suit, and the application to add the 5th defendant was made after the limitation period had expired. The judgment emphasized that the limitation period is affected only when a new party is formally added to the suit, not merely by filing an application. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Oct 1924 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310316