https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310313 The HC allowed the criminal petitions, setting aside the orders issued by the Presiding Officer of the Special Court for Economic Offences in Bangalore. The court found that the summons were issued mechanically using a printed proforma, lacking the required application of mind as mandated by Section 204 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The cases were remitted back to the Special Court, directing it to reassess the material and ensure compliance with Section 204 before proceeding further. The records of both cases were ordered to be returned to the lower court for proper consideration. en-us Thu, 31 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Oct 2023 15:34:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310313 The HC allowed the criminal petitions, setting aside the orders issued by the Presiding Officer of the Special Court for Economic Offences in Bangalore. The court found that the summons were issued mechanically using a printed proforma, lacking the required application of mind as mandated by Section 204 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The cases were remitted back to the Special Court, directing it to reassess the material and ensure compliance with Section 204 before proceeding further. The records of both cases were ordered to be returned to the lower court for proper consideration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 31 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310313